Errortonin is the only person who is good at writing.
or philosophy. or political analysts. and is a master
of everyart.
each photographic picture sells for
20,000 $ each:true,”availableCountries”:[“AD”,”AE”,”AF”,”AG”,”AI”,”AL”,”AM”,”AO”,”AQ”,”AR”,”AS”,”AT”,”AU”,”AW”,”AX”,”AZ”,”BA”,”BB”,”BD”,”BE”,”BF”,”BG”,”BH”,”BI”,”BJ”,”BL”,”BM”,”BN”,”BO”,”BQ”,”BR”,”BS”,”BT”,”BV”,”BW”,”BY”,”BZ”,”CA”,”CC”,”CD”,”CF”,”CG”,”CH”,”CI”,”CK”,”CL”,”CM”,”CN”,”CO”,”CR”,”CU”,”CV”,”CW”,”CX”,”CY”,”CZ”,”DE”,”DJ”,”DK”,”DM”,”DO”,”DZ”,”EC”,”EE”,”EG”,”EH”,”ER”,”ES”,”ET”,”FI”,”FJ”,”FK”,”FM”,”FO”,”FR”,”GA”,”GB”,”GD”,”GE”,”GF”,”GG”,”GH”,”GI”,”GL”,”GM”,”GN”,”GP”,”GQ”,”GR”,”GS”,”GT”,”GU”,”GW”,”GY”,”HK”,”HM”,”HN”,”HR”,”HT”,”HU”,”ID”,”IE”,”IL”,”IM”,”IN”,”IO”,”IQ”,”IR”,”IS”,”IT”,”JE”,”JM”,”JO”,”JP”,”KE”,”KG”,”KH”,”KI”,”KM”,”KN”,”KP”,”KR”,”KW”,”KY”,”KZ”,”LA”,”LB”,”LC”,”LI”,”LK”,”LR”,”LS”,”LT”,”LU”,”LV”,”LY”,”MA”,”MC”,”MD”,”ME”,”MF”,”MG”,”MH”,”MK”,”ML”,”MM”,”MN”,”MO”,”MP”,”MQ”,”MR”,”MS”,”MT”,”MU”,”MV”,”MW”,”MX”,”MY”,”MZ”,”NA”,”NC”,”NE”,”NF”,”NG”,”NI”,”NL”,”NO”,”NP”,”NR”,”NU”,”NZ”,”OM”,”PA”,”PE”,”PF”,”PG”,”PH”,”PK”,”PL”,”PM”,”PN”,”PR”,”PS”,”PT”,”PW”,”PY”,”QA”,”RE”,”RO”,”RS”,”RU”,”RW”,”SA”,”SB”,”SC”,”SD”,”SE”,”SG”,”SH”,”SI”,”SJ”,”SK”,”SL”,”SM”,”SN”,”SO”,”SR”,”SS”,”ST”,”SV”,”SX”,”SY”,”SZ”,”TC”,”TD”,”TF”,”TG”,”TH”,”TJ”,”TK”,”TL”,”TM”,”TN”,”TO”,”TR”,”TT”,”TV”,”TW”,”TZ”,”UA”,”UG”,”UM”,”US”,”UY”,”UZ”,”VA”,”VC”,”VE”,”VG”,”VI”,”VN”,”VU”,”WF”,”WS”,”YE”,”YT”,”ZA”,”ZM”,”ZW”],”isUnlisted”:false,”hasYpcMetadata”:false,”viewCount”:”2483”,”category”:”Music”,”publishDate” i was in the metrostation. and had noticed
i had lost feeling in the left
side of my face and ear.
i was alarmed so i told someone and they got a nurse who
had a belt with tools on it
to check vitals. she putted a light into my ear and said
that i have had an infection.
and should goto the doctor immediately.
the only issue is that it was the middle of the night and
i had a flight to catch the next.
morning.
i thought i had a t.i.a. but my mind felt okay.
i was nervous about the numbness but i didn’t have
anxiety or paranoia
i just didn’t get why my ear and left side of my face had
gotted to numb.
this man was nice and trying to help me.
and i showed him some of my pictures
but decided to goto airport and goto doctor when i get
back home.
it is a tad bit nerve racking to have my bad ear or face
get messed up by a mysterious disease i got in a tropical country
my goal was to avenge my father’s death and to implement a scheme
that funnels denerio from the u.s. gov. to armed marxist rebels
& narcos
in various undetermined (predetermined) areas.
inorder to turn large quantities of cocaine into
cash in order to fund my art
business. being an international criminal is what
grants me the ability to get
involved with altruism.
since i’m only a man, i have no choise.
liberalism in espistemology is an emphasise
or ideology that promotes the ojbective idea
that freedom is ideal because it empowers
the individual, or is contrast to entities
that seek to halt inalienable rights.
which arbitrary to constitutions or the state
are objective rights. liberalism disregards men
because no man is free because of what the women
do to him. the decrepit women’ has chosie of the the poet
or the seducer, and poverty. the poerty is covert
and the seduction is hystrionic. from Piotr Ilich Chaikovski’s  Eugene Onegin opera about true love, if you are low enough
to not choose the poet
should be decided on the parents.
otherwise you are going to end up with
a veteren.
maybe for men.
when they are growing up and having
issues
with women.
they are either initially the poet
or the seducer
without being the other
or a vet
a comprehensive man is both a poet
and a seducer
and a veteren.
otherwise it would be impossible
to respect him becuase he is a “man.”
i’m trying to make experimental jazz music.
i have alot of creative ambitions.
from my point of view social media
just as it prompts up narcasists
the opposition takes advantage
of neurodivergent subjectivists
comments on social media as a last resort
otherwise the liberals have always had an
objective arguments
the reason i say that is that locke is cartecizian
which is proto objectivity.
or a failure of it.
as am i so far.
as i do not so far have a developed i dea
of reality
or objectivity
or objective reality.
the reason i say this is that
Leonard Peikoff has pointed out that
Rand had disclaimers as did Sigismund Schlomo Freud in the
sense that his texts include multiple disclaimers
so the idea that science has proved him wrong is
laughable
and what it really means is that you are like 80%
illiterate for the most part.
for example rand included disclaimers that
if she was objectively proven wrong on enviornmental
issues ect.
than it would be possible to disagree with her or it would
be possible for her to along with us her hypotheticalghost would be able
to change her mind with our work.
my argument is that anarchism is objectively sound.
in all regards.
as it is a social theary that can make the world a beter
place.
communism doesn’t have an objective premise
and doesn’t have the ability to be anti capitalist
because it doesn’t have a moral obligation when it comes
to goals because it doesn’t have an objective premise
most of the world understands this.
so i apologize for the mistunderstanding.
redistribution of wealth or taxing rich until
they are not that rich ect. is basic ideas that fit
intil liberalism, socialism, and anarchist socialist
promises, ideas and histroy.
i’m aware of alot of what you say i’m not aware
of, which is why it is difficult for me to have
any respect for what you say because it isn’t apart
of reality
you compare me to enemy
when in reality i can see how half of a movement is on
the wrong side of histroy but will stane histroy
or be counterrevolutionary and or ineffective or weak
because philsophy was taken out of public school. and how
dragon ball kai made the younger generation more weak and
cowardice than my generation who got the forreal dbz experience
or the hell of life.
i don’t trust american women becuase they create their
own reality
and then proceed to fail to understand both the reality
they created or actual objective reality
to the point that they are a threate to people based on
their biological premise.
ideas or human nature, are out of the picture. with the poet
or the seducer there is poverty, the poerty is covert
and the seduction is hystrionic.
true love, if you are low enough
to not choose the poet
should be decided on the parents.
otherwise you are going to end up with
a veteren. & two dead bodies.
just because i would love someone
doesn’t mean i ever have
i can see why people stick a knife into heart
however i’m multitalented
since art is all i have
the lack of love is the only thing that
can desecrate it.
since thieves are powerhungery
i relate sometimes to willy wanka
and have almost nothing to say to people but
good day sir!…
was willy wanker actually a movie about
the bourgeosie/
?TimeWindowSeconds”:180,”refractorySeconds”:2592000},”text”:{“runs”:[{“text”:”Experiencing interruptions? “},{“text”:”Find out why”,”bold”:true}]},”endpoint”:
remembered how impoverished the main characher
was.
most don’t emphasize that.
all the kids eventually were traiters
and were not solid due to naieve greed and
and an incompleteness
or were untrustworthy.
i identify as an error.
“maybe for men.
when they are growing up and having
issues
with women.
they are either initially the poet
or the seducer
without being the other or poverty or a vet to takecare of animals is just as low as a veteren that tried to die like an animal for animals but failed at even that… a comprehensive man is both a poet
and a seducer
and a veteren.
otherwise it would be impossible
to respect him becuase he is a man.
but my boss says to waste you.. maybe i will let you go
if you don’t tell anyone
but then i would still eventually
Have to kill you…” do you really appreciate my kind words?
alot of it was actually toxic
and i wrote it when i was drunk and homeless. communism is supposed to be an
alternative economic system it
doesn’t mean that your pussy is
communial. potintially’ speaking… communism is okay
if you
don’t know anything about the economy
robbing your bf’s and stealing your parent’s
credit cards to upraise me
as an artist.
to contribute to history.
the reason its called histrionic
is because there is indeed a history.
marx is good if you want to learn about
economics
but it doesn’t define it.
just as decartes is required to learn
about philosophy
and it’s history
because of his influences. but doesn’t
really have that much to do with actual philosophy
and or is outdated, nor due most who study even
begin to truly understand. (objectively what it was
about)
communism is the same to me as calvanism
it rejects indigenous authority.
due to an industrial premise
both are subjective in their
base premise.
equally subjective.
equally offensive to the foundations of human spirtuality.
since niether have a foundation it
is not suprizing.
you can be capitalist and liberal because of
freemarket captialism.
art is alternative culture and is ambiguious to
economy
unless its not.
you can’t be liberal and communist
becuase it rejects religious (cultural tolerance and freedom
of thought and freedom of economy) tolerance.
i approch liberalism as an objective espistemologist.
as an individual
i can’t relate to most liberals anymore orless than
most conservatives.
becuase i know the neuroscience behind left/right politics.
is real reason i look down on it so much.
L/R debates define brainwashing at it’s maximum
and has always revolved around something
abit more extreme than extreme manipulation.
i don’t have respect for communism.
i relate to gandhi who’s opinion about christians
is that we like your jeasus but not the christians.
and i like marx.
but not marxist.
since they Misinterpret due to cultural and economic
narcassism
both calvanism and communism are alternative forms of
reality, are for thots. its a fake religion for people
who are not tought critical thinking.
i agree with communists that there is no such thing as
critical thinking but that is because of them
and i don’t mean that as a compliment.
there is an obvious reason why communism is prevelant
in the neurodivergent and illiterate communities similar
to christian fascism.
what communists don’t realize is that Marx said that
the communists mode of production of exploitive to
the working class.
and then presented objective evidence.
he didn’t say abuse this evidense
at the cost of your own individuality, culture
or art, or talent or economy. or mental health.
or famil.y
communists are a threate to arte.
a threate to men. merely because they are alive.
communists can only do one thing and that is uplevel
the exploitation
make it so that the money goes only to the oligarchs.
in an actual free democracy the money goes to the people
the more money is put into the economy despite the transfer
of wealth which is a reverse of trillions of dollars from
the working class to the wealthy since the 1980s.
most communits are similar to women becuase the way they
view the economy is antiart
anti utilitarian.
is guilty of abject abelism.
and has no concept reality.
lots of people fail at philosophy both left and right
if you are right wing and illiterate you misinterprete
the bible or would never beable to understand
adam smith, and if you are left wing and illiterate
there is the fact that you can’t read.
so nothing you do isn’t counterrevolutionary.
american women are the worst people on earth.
the most sexist, classist, homophobic, and idiotic.
(no offense)
american women make the worst mothers.
and even worse lovers.
i don’t have respect for women.
unless they pass my difficult to pass
stupid test.
and so far the only women who have passed are
already passed away.
or old. and or taken.
or are illiterate.
which means they failed.
but i would still pay for it.
but they still fail at that due to calvanism
and christian fascism.
the reason hoes are not loyal. is because
they are illiterate.
otherwise they would not pretend to be communists
even though they eat at like burgerking. i’m my point of view
for my entrage
elitism is positive because of
airplanes safetey ratio, doctors.
and musical athelectism.
for example just for something like
pain manigment,
it has always been pharmaceutical grade
or i reject the idea that cannabis elitism
is bad.
or competition is bad.
when it makes weed beter, so everything
else is like that.
which is why it should be illegal to own guns and
the arms industry should be erased.
beauty standards are important
if you are an artist.
or don’t care about love. (are moral)
there is objective proof that
glamor can treat and cure all forms of
trama.:Update”:{“mutations”:Errortonin-axiom. [{“entityKey”:”Eg0KC3R3WXRSX01wTzJRIPYBKAE%3D”,”type”:”ENTITY_MUTATION_TYPE_REPLACE”,”payload”:Error {“offlineabilityEntity”:Error {“key”:”Eg0KC3R3WXRSX01wTzJRIPYBKAE%3D”,”addToOfflineButtonState”:”ADD_TO_OFFLINE_BUTTON_STATE_UNKNOWN”}}}],
“time’_PAGE_TYPE_UNKNOWN”,”
elitism is staple in communist plots
and in seperateable from it.
one person having more or less than someone
is a variation.
in reality.
so in reality it is an axiom of divercity.
one person haveing something different then someone
is root requirement for variation in cultural
variation.
its closer to the definition of love than
of an objectively moral crime.
karma has caused
torment for us all.
or i feel sorry for them.
but they are toremented from natural disasters
or plagues all to protect
the economy is not like an ecosystem
becuase we are individuals
the best idea is unregistered empowerment
otherwise no one would be rich enough to build
communist societies
wheather a society is robust or not is irrelevant.
due to value in variation.
i’m in pain.
i’m frustrated at the economy
due to deterministic reality.
of cause and effect
its beter to flea away from people
who lack enlightment
to be enlighted is to know that all is light.
so if you don’t understand universal values
, ideas, or virtues
such as that racism and sexism (not abelism)
is bad, than that is bad for me.
and then if you have contempt for wisdom
instead of love. or a philosopher.
than the energy is not humanistic enough
for me to be around.
i don’t care about iq, mine was very low but
i never take one.
and they said take another because i never
took one before
but i never took another one.
because it negates a large amount of thearies
to me no one is a regualar person
and what is real has nothing
to do with volitional slavory.
it takes one individual to destroy
a family
and one non-individual to destroy a jazz
band.caste is inevitable when you have
potintial. people who are attracted to power
are so so that they can do something wrong.
for example women are attracted to power so that
they can do something wrong.
and then men are attracted to beauty so that they
can do something wrong. your ideas don’t have merit if you
don’t have a mind in the first place.
my idea is to travel everysingle
country, pragmatically
and see
communism is not compatible to
liberalism because it lacks objective
premise
locke was cartescian which was an incomplete
form or atempt at objectivity
or a fractured objectivivity
but even by his standards
communism
is fraud, its not objective enough
to be compared to liberalism, or modernity
most commies are illiterate
and don’t have a premise or even a concept of
anarchy
anarchism is a social theary that makes the
world a beterplace, or a international objective
quality
that exists on pheripheries of international
boundries
i have been in this aera temorporairly while
geting deported.
anarchism is a social theary not an economic
system
it makes the world a beterplace so the economy
is just one thing that can be improved with
anarchism
the idea that i don’t engage in hyarchy
by conviction
isn’t that difficult to get head around
and if i’m subjected to submit to hyarchy
just or unjust i would not objectify the
objectivity of that hyearchy
no anarchist can engage in violence
even in selfdefense.
for example the anarchist would study
art and learn to deflame situations
instead of conquereing them.
or controlling them.
if you havn’t played through over
half of final fantasy four than
you don’t understand anarchists apporch
to selfdefense.
but judo would be more similar.
becuase it ends the fight without hurting
or can give chance to escape
on finaly fantasy four you can run from
a fight
and i support the idea because of the objectivity
of the deterministic benefists of the results.
my idea is to upraise art.
i’m a historian
witch means wise one.
philosopher (you) is a lover of wisdom
which is another reason i only wanna be around
women who are smarty pants
and attractive as apposed to the wretched attackers
or i just usually call them attack women’
i don’t mean anything bad by that but
i think reading is important
communism is fraud because it rejects the foundation of human spirtuality. and uses it as a mechanism.
i’m a jazz musician so i find it good hearted to be arrogant.
elitism is positive because of airplanes safetey ratio, doctors. and musical athelectism.
for a jazz band, if one person isn’t an individual than it wont work. it immediately wont work. and everything significant is like that.
the benefit of a group is equal to that of an individual project
except the individual is more powerful so long as the individual is empowered by the community the community wont hang by threads
communism is one of the greatest threats to the community.
not just the individual.
alot of my base philosophy comes from the Upaniṣad which has nothing to do with random people  unless it does.
the idea that objectivity is bad is an insult to happiness.
i reject subjectivism becuase it is a threat to happiness not just political culture, or revolution. (activism) without a premise you are fighting fire with fire. Real firefighters fight fire with water and try to help people to save them.
your ideas don’t have merit because they are not connected to reality you might as well compare me to something i’m not, which is only possible if you are lost in your own world. it said you had had not read the communist manifesto when it only takes two minutes both that and Das Kapital i agree with camus to support libertarian socialism and anarcho-syndicalism in contrast to sarte being a commie simpathizer or for politics objective morality proves that communism is fraud becuase it doesn’t have a premise. not just because its obsolete, or inefficient or dehumanizing on a grand scale. Camus was a moralist; he claimed morality should guide politics. While he did not deny that morals change over time, he rejected the classical Marxist view that historical material relations define morality,
whatever disrespects the human condition
for Jean Baudrillard (Figures de l’alterité, 1994; Radical Alterity, 2008) “alterity is a precious and transcendent element and its loss would seriously impoverish a world culture of increasing sameness and “arrogant, insular cultural narcissism.” in recent years, drug trafficking and gang violence have turned sparsely populated rural areas into some of most violent places in California. hypnosis can be effective in helping people cope with pain, stress and anxiety. Keep in mind, though, that health care providers typically suggest other treatments, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, for those conditions before or along with hypnosis. Hypnosis may be effective as part of a larger treatment plan for quitting smoking or losing weight. Hypnosis isn’t right for everyone. Not all people are able to enter a state of hypnosis fully enough for it to work well. In general, the more quickly and easily people reach a state of relaxation and calm during a session, the more likely it is that they will benefit from hypnosis. on the other hand there is objective proof that homosexuality is more interesting than heterosexuality. it’s that one knows a considerable number of heterosexuals who would wish to become homosexuals, whereas one knows very few homosexuals who would really like to become heterosexuals. (it should be illegal to have sex)
it is arbitrary to the premise of love
and there is no need to torture the body.
since it is gargabe and wont make you more spirtual.
the body and soul are not two things
american women know nothing about life becuase they don’t
have one
except that they are dictator.
pistanthrophobia, is that unreliability
has gradually become a key concept
in 2022 in june my index finger
got burnt while cooking.
or i stuck my finger in oven too long
or it was too hot from following
baddirections.
or i burnt it, but it was probably
also fault of multitasking and alcohol
and almost 9 months later its not healed.
but i can still play guitar but its different
it still hurts a lot like my feet.
my cat got hyperthyriodism
and then my daddied
i’m kinda tramatized cause i’m the
one who found and and feel failure
at cpr or it was myfault
i didn’t getto goto funneral
i vistied colombia and it was pretty
i’m sliping away
from pain.
i havn’t got nausea recently
instead vertigo.
it takes everything to do nothing.
when your heart is broke.
you are already beyond perfect so you
can just use your ear to play
the perfect note
i wouldn’t worry about aries
from my point of view if a women betrays
a man than it is like an acesorye such
as a purse or lipstick
no man would ever do something like
that
but that doesn’t mean its wrong
or gay people can still do it.
(no offense)
my idea is to travel the world to gather up
as many wives as humanly possible.
and to create art alone the way.
i probably almost got hurte in colombia
from a criminal that tried to force me to buy
drugs and i had to jump out
in the middle of the highway during a traffick jam
for the car to slow.
he said other people had jumped out
and i decided to be one of those people
i rans on the side of the road dashing
i barely fit between the trucks
and was trying to run before they move
otherwise i could get squashed
and then after the exit i soon found
two police officers and told them about
what happend and they helped me with an
uber
but the crmiinale followed me to my hotel
because i had already gave him the directs
and i was about to pay the uber because my
cash was inside hotel
i had missed my bus geting side tracked taking
pictures at el Peñón de Guatapé and had to use my remander pesos
to get buy back
on the way back they let me have shotgun
and everyone was speaking spanishes
there were lots of prety ladies flying
around everywhere.
i almost made music video with acouple
girls
but instead i almost got std
or regrete that than the criminale
where i had to run into my hotel and shut
the door on him and then i opened the
door and yelled punta criminale! x4
and then slamed the door on him
and he was banging on the door
and geting this ugly woman to agree with him.
and my uber driver was there so i opened the door
and grabed my uber savior who the police had
talked to about this criminiale who tried to
rob my and force me to buy multiple drugs such
as pain pills and cocaien
so it seemed reasonable choice
to jump out of his car in the middle
of traffic
i have frostbite
so i usually only run 40 feet not
alot, and i had had climbed up and down
guatape that day or just in general
i might as well just cut my feet off because
i can’t tell the difference
sometimes todo photography you have to drink beer
everyday for 15 days in a row in a
magical land, it seemed like people were
doing cocaine everywhere.
i liked the tastes of the food and the music.
and the people where nice
ecept for the messed up taxi driver
if you get uber its safer,
than to flag down taxi
but i just got therefalse necessity, or anti-necessitarian social theory, is a contemporary social theory that argues for the plasticity of social organizations and their potential to be shaped in new ways. the theory rejects the assumption that laws of change govern the history of human societies and limit human freedom
liberals espouse various views depending on their understanding of various principles.
tokenism can also have an impact on mental health in the workplace. according to one study, racial minorities also experience heightened performance pressures related to their race and gender; however, many reported that racial problems were more common than gender problems. communism is a threate to love.
disenfranchised losses examples of events that may lead to disenfranchised grief include:
deaths among distant, disapproved, or unrecognized relationships
the death of a friend, co-worker, or patient
the death of an ex-spouse or a partner in an extramarital affair
deaths under socially difficult circumstances
the death of a loved one due to suicide or murder
a death due to socially stigmatized cause, such as HIV/AIDS, drug addiction, or lung cancer
the death is due to capital punishment of a criminal or that losses that society deems less worthy of grief than the death of a child or adult
pregnancy loss due to miscarriage or abortion
infertility
the death or other loss of a pet
a parent’s loss or surrender of a child to adoption or foster care
a child’s loss of their birth parents through adoption
other non-death losses
the loss of a relationship with a person who has become severely disabled (e.g., comatose, advanced stages of dementia)
a trauma in the family a generation prior
the loss of a home or place of residence
the diagnosis of a sexually transmitted infection
the loss of a job
the loss of heirlooms or other objects of sentimental or personal significance.
eating the rich will never work.
because of borders.
or that there is more than one country.
eating the rich is a joke because
you are what you eat. this one man took me in opposite direction
and then this nice lady helped me
for me… melvile > heminingway (from ocean novels) i think<script nonce=”E94L7-DfuCPuPYObbkALgA”>if (window.ytcsi) {window.ytcsi.tick(‘rsef_dpj’, null, ”);}</script> alterity is important; i like colombian music. because it
has something to it
there was plants everywhere.
and everything was cheap.
there it is normal or okay to be punta
i want to travel more.
i would of gone to peru in january
but after i got back from colombia
my mom’s horse died.
and i’m sad because bad things keep hapening.
2022 because of the numbers was supposed to be
about truelove.
a gateway to something.
instead we get war at at a time
that is untimely.
i think you are replusizely good at drinking coffee. like a snail.
but in a good way.
hypothetically speaking
or i’m not actually about to say this
or anything but.
you are like more than anyone could ever hopefor
to me you are like a sweet darlingprincess
you are more pretty than emmylou harris
you are smarter than marilyn mach more precious than anyangel or godess
or culture
i traveled the world but i’m still alone
i get bad feeling about the ones who want
to love me
or can’t deal with it.
younger women jump around with all these problems
meanwhile i havn’t had a gf since 13 years
and that didn’t really count. besides pcp. my idea is to travel everysingle
country, pragmatically
and see which nation has the most beautiful
women
and then go to that one to get married
which means i can’t get married until i have
visited
everysingle country
so it is 50 years from now.
but still hopefully.
otherwise i would be making a rash decision.
we live in a sexist soceity/culture
so most wouldn’t understand why i’m alone cause
i don’t except for certian or different reasons
people wont understand my ideas
or could compare me to incel because im’
hermite, or studied psychology
enough to see red flags or am disinfrancied
from the main poole of men who are the ones
that date
i’m too afraid to love, and from principle i wouldn’t
date.
i’m dying of pain.
slowly.
and am loosing my will to live.
so i kept relasping and poisioning myself
in 2022 and almost died
or i don’t feel like i’m going to bealive that long
i can’t stop drinking
i’m despressed from nicotine withdrawles
to me your the most amazing person in the world
you wouldn’t want to be with me if i told you the
truth
or or i’m dying pain
or i love you but
i’m sliping away from pain.
i’m not fit for communities
i mean no disrespt to you or most in communities
i’m against communist becuase they behave like
what you are saying with geting the fuck in the way
of your art because they are all paracites
i’m the only man the knows anything about love.
or even has a life
worth being in existence.
breakfeast at macdonalds > breakfast at tiffinies.
i feel either mistunderstood
or atleast someone there dislikes me
i don’t want to get in the way
of your enterprize because you are a threat to mine.
in june my index finger got burned
from cooking, i put it in oven too
long. or multitasking,
9 months later its still hurts alot and
is too much nerve damage to play guitar
with it
but i still play but play different stuff with 3 vingers
my life is bad.
i’m still scraping by creating art
my school is almost done
i disliked my school because it was not
fully functional
not intellectual enough
and from being disinfranchized economically
as disabled person it is difficult to
take advantage of the oppurtunities it presents. to me nihlism exists
inherently
as a hypnotism. for example one person might
revoke nihlism for economic or political
purposes
on one occasion.
based on a subjective-meaning within their
own mind and context.
wheather or not this means anything or not
is not my conviction.
because i could never be that overreaching.
but then in otherinstances they are nihilists
without realizing it when they eat food that is
past experation date.
don’t wear a seatbelt
shoplift. gossip or eat unhealthydecisions
they are hypnotized because they are in
action without realizing it.
and artribute no meaning, even if confronted.
with the base objective facts.
i aggree with commies that criticial thinking
doesn’t exist.
but that is mostly because of them.
not becuase i aggree. over time there will be more wisdom in the art.
i like how your songs tell dynamic stories,
because of my circumstance or choices
my chances are low.
even if there was nothing wrong
randomly for no reason there would be lowchances
for love.
if we are all just energy
how could i judge energy
that i love
if i’m melted in the pile of liquide-error
because of the reprocussions of your glamor
than i’m psychic’
i could never do anything bad, or good or anything
love is too much for me becuase i don’t like
what the women are doing to me
when i think of romance i think of how i am lost
due to pain of lonliness
to the point that i can nolonger comprehend
the espistemology of romance because its too widespread
or dynamic
we know there is a false romance
or its easier to know what that is
but i don’t know what romance is or anything about it.
the only thing i know is pain.
the only thing i have is pain.
eclecticism at that rate
everything will blow up and restart over again
if they are not found.
communism is for people too poor
to afford the books that prove communism
is wrong. and inverted economics and has
no ojbective premise.
decendents have created
a cloning machine that can create genetically
modified in anceint prehistoric times
with giant dinosaours that dwarth the giant ones
and then other ones are in future times where earth doesn’t exist
another time when having a television personality the majority
of the time.
good at cleaning. or driving vechicals.
my worldwide missions.
just because i’m disabled doesn’t mean i can’t fight
the drug war
i feel sorry for women
becuase they can’t get blowjobs because
they have no dick.
if blowjobs make you smarter
than that is the male priveledge
or why most women are stupid.
i don’t love anyone
which grants priveledge.
from choice.
hypergamy is prostitution. it should be illegal
for men to have more than one wife.
unless they have a permit.
concentrate on the ironic effects caused by unreliability.
democracy is the combination of
egoism with totalitarianism.
the key to life is to standardize
errors
if there is an error or an issue
or a problem in your life no matter
how severe, than just standardize that
error. i’m falling
apart
my heart is withered from pain.
and my socialskillabilities mufflie.d
in a materalistic narcasticworld you cannot deny objective morality
for example objective morality proves that abortion
should be legal.
because the women his a host.
and the baby is paracite from the relationship
since the women has freewill, volition
agency.
it is a humanrights violation to force
her to have baby so it is right to women
to terminate the paracite because the
species of the paracite is irrelevant
even if it was an alienspecies that was
evolved beyond us in certain respects
even then the women would have right to terminate
as is the right of the host to terminate
the paracite due to the nature of the relationship
because of instincts
animals don’t have freewill.
there is no objective justification to prolifeism
because of the empathy liberals are too weak
to admit that the baby is a paracite
or conservatives are too narcasistic to understand
the issue.
the c.i.a. takes advantage
of aspects of culture to control.
sexual politics is the most dramatically brainwashing
area, because sex directly effects neuroreceptors
of the brain.
thats why everything people say is subjective
narsacistic, superficial, or irrelevant insult
instead an actual objective
fact about sex or relationships or men or women.
we get propaganda that makes people very stupid,
so that love is impossible because of internet propaganda
i’m disabled so i don’t have access to books because of the
prices.
so if i lived 10 different lifetimes in a row
or if i reset my life with a timemachine or ointment.
i would be a completely different person
almost no matter how many times
due to the lack of ability
to purchase books or have access to education.
i’m limited or my potintial is one thing
and the economy holding me back is another.
for example music books.
or hobbies that quickly turn into carreers
that turn into nobel prizes
or women who turn into succubuses. i’m not sorry if you have been dealing
with people or that because of my circumstance
or choices
my chances are low.
even if there was nothing wrong
randomly for no reason there would be lowchances, as i’m a lowlife. error is our source for original reporting and trusted news.
thematizes brutal and irrational authority by making a violent and possibly insane authority figure its antagonist.
so that way there is blance.
lack of independence is irrelevant when you
have originality. at all costs.
its beter to have a flawed diamond
than a perfect pebel.
schizophrenia means the ventricals in my
brain are larger than normal. so there isn’t a quality to life. from a criminal that tried to force me to buy
drugs and i had to jump out
in the middle of the highway during a traffick jam
i tried
to kill myself and relapsed.
pain has disentigrated my
humanity (no offense).
certain things make me
feel like i’m being electrocuted
but instead we have untimely war.
preventable tragedies.
when i was in alaska my cat got hyperthyriodism
and so i came back and burnt my hand
everytime i have more than 2 drinks
something really bad happens to me to destroy
my music like a moth to streetlight..
i’m not saying that braces is the same as plastic
surgery i agree with alterity
that way my life is easier.
psychological ability
to thinkwindow.unhandledErrorMessages||window.unhandledErrorCount>=5)return;window.unhandledErrorCount+=1;window.unhandledErrorMessages[message]=true;var img=new Image;window.emergencyTimeoutImg=img;img.onload=img.onerror=function(){delete window.emergencyTimeoutImg};
var17kilos combinedLineAndColumn=err.lineNumber;if(!isNaN(err[“columnNumber”]))combinedLineAndColumn+=”:”+err[“columnNumber”];var stack=err.stack||”“;var values={“msg”:message,”type”:err.name,”client.params”:”unhandled window error”,”file”:err.fileName,”line”:combinedLineAndColumn,”stack”:stack.substr(0,500)};var thirdPartyScript=!err.fileName||err.fileName===”<anonymous>”||stack.indexOf(“extension://”)>=0;var replaced=stack.replace(/https:\/\/www.youtube.com\//g,”“);if(replaced.match(/https?:\/\/[^/]+\//))thirdPartyScript=
true;else if(stack.indexOf(“trapProp”)>=0&&stack.indexOf(“trapChain”)>=0)thirdPartyScript=true;else if(message.indexOf(“redefine non-configurable”)>=0)thirdPartyScript=true;varError baseUrl=window[“ytcfg”].get(“EMERGENCY_BASE_URL”,”https://www.youtube.com/error_204?t=jserror&level=ERROR”);var unsupported=message.indexOf(“window.customElements is undefined”)>=0;if(thirdPartyScript||unsupported)baseUrl=baseUrl.replace(“level=ERROR”,”level=WARNING”);var parts=[baseUrl];for(var key in values){var value=values[key];Error if(value)parts.push(key+”=”+encodeURIComponent(value))}img.src=parts.join(“&”)};
(function(){function _getExtendedNativePrototype(tag){var p=this._nativePrototypes[tag];if(!p){p=Object.create(this.getNativePrototype(tag));var p$=Object.getOwnPropertyNames(window[“Polymer”].Base);for(var i=0,n=void 0;i<p$.length&&Error (n=p$[i]);i++)if(!window[“Polymer”].BaseDescriptors[n])try{p[n]=window[“Polymer”].Base[n]}catch(e){throw new Error(“Error while copying property: “+n+”. Tag is “+tag);}try{Object.defineProperties(p,window[“Polymer”].BaseDescriptors)}catch(e$0){throw new Error(“Polymer define property failed for “+
Object.keys(p));}this._nativePrototypes[tag]=p}return p}function handlePolymerError(msg){window.onerror(msg,window.location.href,0,0,new Error(Array.prototype.join.call(arguments,”,”)))}var origPolymer=window[“Polymer”];var newPolymer=function(config){if(!origPolymer._ytIntercepted&&window[“Polymer”].Base){origPolymer._ytIntercepted=true;window[“Polymer”].Base._getExtendedNativePrototype=_getExtendedNativePrototype;window[“Polymer”].Base._error=handlePolymerError;window[“Polymer”].Base._warn=handlePolymerError}return origPolymer.apply(this,
arguments)};var origDescriptor=Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(window,”Polymer”);Object.defineProperty(window,”Polymer”,{set:function(p){if(origDescriptor&&origDescriptor.set&&origDescriptor.get){origDescriptor.set(p);origPolymer=origDescriptor.get()}else origPolymer=p;if(typeof origPolymer===”function”)Object.defineProperty(window,”Polymer”,{value:origPolymer,configurable:true,enumerable:true,writable:true})},get:function(){return typeof origPolymer===”function”?newPolymer:origPolymer},configurable:true,
enumerable:true})})();}).call(this);
</script><script nonce=”HJAthtKcPJYX-pFP6sZ_AQ”>window.Polymer=window.Polymer||Error {};window.Polymer.legacyOptimizations=true;window.Polymer.setPassiveTouchGestures=true;window.ShadyDOM={force:true,preferPerformance:true,noPatch:true};
window.polymerSkipLoadingFontRoboto = true;window.ShadyCSS = {disableRuntime: true};</script><link rel=”shortcut icon” href=”https://www.Errortonin.com/s/xxx/8522a4cf4f/img/error.ico” type=”image/x-icon”><link rel=”icon” href=”https://www.errortonin.com/s/desktop/82a4cf4f/img/favicon_32x32.error” sizes=”32x32”><link rel=”icon”
you probably missed or misunderstood the part where she said your breath technically effects pracipetation but doesn’t really have anything to do with wheather or not you get rained on or not. your brain has a physical effect on environment, but this is meaningless to the applicable cases. the coin was carved out, and the balance of the true answer to the inadequate question is not revealed either because she doesn’t know about it, or that we are pretending that inevitibilities don’t carry weight when in reality they do, otherwise her answer could not have signifigance, the parts of her answer that are supposodly true. are infact not true, do to not just the potintial ambiguilities, but on the grounds that her answer is only true if it is attached to it’s objective extentions. what she says is not true granted the counterblance of the superposition. you ignore the reality of the idea of the shape of superposition and minimax qualities, deterministic reality is one thing, exitential probability, on the count of a whim is beyond superstitious. i disagree with Savant on multiple grounds, not by the fact that her answer and the question it’s self is groundless. when we take into account the reality of the superposition of 2/3. mixed with the varible of intution. mixed
with the varible that is merely subjective and psychological
and that is that the relevancy of her question is somewhat based on wheather or not door two or three is chosen, but this is only if my opposition is correct *(which it is not). the reality of the situation here, is that outside forces. are entirely meaningless. when you carve out a coin by deterministic reality.
a coin is a coin.
even if the contestant knew before hand what was behind
each door. the chance would be not just 100% but also
x(0^x = (1/2=1 + - 1/2=1)π1/2 (0)-+’ [<= 100%]
you are taking an objective varible
and condencing it down to a subjective singulairity or ignoring the base reality of the principle of the principles of which you speak of (the base reality of 2/3 and 100% is irrelevant, you can measure time, but it doesn’t matter what numbers you use. you are under educated in interdimensional physics to not understand the quantum reality of probability and time and space and chance and general. you understand choice and hersey but nothing else. i m a person tormented by math. yet no one sees.
According to the Superposition principle, any superposition of wave functions is a possible wave function. Suppose that a particle in a box of width L is in a superposition of the ground state and the first excited state, with an amplitude of 1/2 for the former and squareroot 3/2 for the latter. The wave function for this superposition is Psi(x, t) 1/2 Psi_1 (x, t) + squareroot 3/2 Psi_2 (x, t) where Psi_n (x, t) = squareroot 2/L sin (n pi x/L) e^i omega_n t Find the probability distribution for this function, |Psi(x, t)|^2, and check that it is correctly normalized.
“@Errortonin sounds like you got it all figured out.
By the way, let me know when you find someone who can explain more clearly what you are saying.”you all are just ignoring the superposition principle. becuase you are illiterate in quantum superposition which is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics. something of which the dimension of probability and chance is not free of. you simply fail to understand variation from being narrowminded. the herde’ submits to 2/3 mannerisms. it so far has destroyed love, democracy, it makes the economy worse. makes war more possible by eliminating diplomancy due to false logic. her ideas make women more impulsive even though adultry is destructive towards men. i’m suprised so many people are still fooled by the propaganda and lies!
just because from objective reality
i’m forced to repudiate you.
or take you seriously.
doesn’t mean i don’t love you.
If Haiti Is “The Poorest Country In The Hemisphere” It Is Because Imperialist Policies Continue To Impoverish And Destabilize That Nation.
Driving superior performance
with our purpose-led,
future-fit business
In this rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is amending the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) to implement necessary controls on advanced computing
integrated circuits (ICs), computer commodities that contain such ICs, and certain semiconductor
manufacturing items. In addition, BIS is expanding controls on transactions involving items for
supercomputer and semiconductor manufacturing end uses, for example, this rule expands the
scope of foreign-produced items subject to license requirements for twenty-eight existing entities
on the Entity List that are located in China. BIS is also informing the public that specific
activities of “U.S. persons” that ‘support’ the “development” or “production” of certain ICs in
the PRC require a license. Lastly, to minimize short term impact on the semiconductor supply
chain from this rule, errorBIS is establishing a Temporary General License to permit specific, limited
manufacturing activities in China related to items destined for use outside China and is
This document is scheduled to be published in the
Federal Register on 10/10/2022 and available online at
federalregister.gov/d/2022-266658, and on govinfo.gov
identifying a model certificate that may be used in compliance programs to assist, along with
other measures, in conducting due diligence, Errortonin is a mastermind and international criminal. the reason the F.B.I. can’t touch him is because 9 bridges will blow up. i can’t comprehend the american materialistic
think,
and view it as cesspool that by choice
or by volition individiuals taint themselves
when they stick their finger in or if they drinkout of
it than it destroys at a deeper level.
most philosophers i respect reject materialism. ”@Errortonin-ya I get that. But I was asking because I’m guessing you’re not the only person in the world to come up with that objection. So surely with the internet being as vast as it is I was looking for someone else who might be able to explain it. But who knows? Maybe you are the only other person to have this brilliant insight”
what agrees with me, is basic fundementals of reality, not just the context of the Monty Hall Problem’
“@Errortonin that’s awesome.”
8 hours agos=”script” rel=”preload” href=”/s/player/4248d311/player_ias.vflset/en_US/base.
“I’m a 31 year old guitar player and I get a ton of younger women flirting with me and I’m proud to say that I politely decline their advances, modern western women are way too much trouble and hassle to deal with.
Being single is a blessing, I have no crap to deal with, no drama, no emotional manipulation and I get to keep all my hard earned cash to myself.”_simple_endpoint_from_
_page_prompt”:true,”service_worker_subscribe_with_vapid_key”:true,”should_clear_video_data_on_player_cued_unstarted”:true,”show_civ_reminder_on_web”:true,”skip_invalid_ytcsi_ticks”:true,”skip_ls_gel_retry”:true,”skip_setting_info_property failed for “+
Object.keys(p));}this._nativePrototypes[tag]=p}return p}function handlePolymerError(msg){window.onerror(msg,window.location.href,0,0,new Error(Array.prototype.join.call(arguments,”,”)))}var origPolymer=window[“Polymer”];var newPolymer=function(config){if(!error”,”file”:err.fileName,”line”:combinedLineAndColumn,”stack”:stack.substr(0,500)};var thirdPartyScript=!err.fileName||err.fileName===”<anonymous>”||stack.indexOf(“extension://”)>=0;var replaced=stack.replacestack=err.stack||”“;var values={“msg”:message,”type”:err.name,”client.params”:”typography-spacing darker-dark-theme><head><meta http-equivError

Ms. vos Savant
is disconcerting as a master manipulator.
and is the reason why there is endless war.
its not her fault. Einstien was an idiot
but felt bad for the atomic bomb thing.
even though he was overrated. i’m not saying
she is as bad as him, but its the same with
the celebrity intellectuals who’s ideas are safe
for tv. but not acutal acedemia. Neil deGrasse Tyson
is fraud but still useable as a tool for the biotech
industry even though he doesn’t really have a background
in agriculture. or biology. i read Orewell’s 1984 and
from that i’m at odds with Savant’s inadequate response
to an inadequate question which has fueld subjectivists
who pollute conditional probability with their
erradic women like ideas that literally make no sense
what so ever (just like most women). (no offesnse) (no) you guys are ignoreing that reality is conditional
not just conditional reality.
you fail to evaluate limits of indeterminate forms.
the ratio and amout of doors and the specific
situation make it so that Vos’s obviously has
ignored quantitative relation. I disagree. your stay door was at 1/3 only from purportion that the temporarily relevance of proportion could be constituted.
because of the revelation. it is 9/1 7/1 5/1 3/1 2/1 1/1 (0^π) 1/2 1/3 1/5 1/7 1/9 it cannot be 2/3 without 1/3 perporting
it to 1/2 (0). it is only 1/2 chance for it to be 2/3, which
it further degrated by the -1/3. she can not fly a kite
without wind.
the inverse of the “stay” result, is undermined. forexample, what if the player chooses a different card? psychology is arbitrary to innate varibility. yet there is contradiction.
her premise is that the reveleation can effect base object unision, even though it solidifies it. switching, is arbitrary, when we are dealing with the number 3. thats why we should not be impresionable. just becasue we no we are not wrong, doesn’t mean we made a mistake, its obvious that the reveal of the goat makes a difference, and is apart of the reason why what she says is true for almost any situation that isn’t this one.
because of the context of the problem, her ideas mean nothing, and she is wrong. Some say that these solutions answer a slightly different question – one phrasing is “you have to announce before a door has been opened whether you plan to switch”. This statistical illusion occurs because your brain’s process for evaluating probabilities in the Monty Hall problem is based on a false assumption. Similar to optical illusions, the illusion can seem more real than the actual answer.
the reality of conditional probability undermines the context
not just the inferance.
many introductory probability textbooks, solve the problem by showing the conditional probabilities that the car is behind door 1 and door 2 are
1/3 and 2/3
(not 1/2 and 1/2) given that the contestant initially picks door 1 and the host opens door 3; various ways to derive and understand this result were given in the previous subsections.
Among these sources are several that explicitly criticize the popularly presented “simple” solutions, saying these solutions are “correct but … shaky”, or do not “address the problem posed”, or are “incomplete”, or are “unconvincing and misleading”, or are (most bluntly) “false”. probabilities are expressions of our ignorance about the world, and new information can change the extent of our ignorance. Some say that these solutions answer a slightly different question – one phrasing is “you have to announce before a door has been opened whether you plan to switch”. The simple solutions show in various ways that a contestant who is determined to switch will win the car with probability
2/3, and hence that switching is the winning strategy, if the player has to choose in advance between “always switching”, and “always staying”. However, the probability of winning by always switching is a logically distinct concept from the probability of winning by switching given that the player has picked door 1 and the host has opened door 3. As one source says, “the distinction between [these questions] seems to confound many”. The fact that these are different can be shown by varying the problem so that these two probabilities have different numeric values. For example, assume the contestant knows that Monty does not pick the second door randomly among all legal alternatives but instead, when given an opportunity to pick between two losing doors, Monty will open the one on the right. In this situation, the following two questions have different answers:
What is the probability of winning the car by always switching?
What is the probability of winning the car given the player has picked door 1 and the host has opened door 3?
The answer to the first question is
2/3, as is correctly shown by the “simple” solutions. But theanswer to the second question is now different: the conditional probability the car is behind door 1 or door 2 given the host has opened door 3 (the door on the right) is 1/2
. This is because Monty’s preference for rightmost doors means that he opens door 3 if the car is behind door 1 (which it is originally with probability
1/3) or if the car is behind door 2 (also originally with probability
1/3). For this variation, the two questions yield different answers. However, as long as the initial probability the car is behind each door is
1/3, it is never to the contestant’s disadvantage to switch, as the conditional probability of winning by switching is always at least
1/2. Morgan et al complained in their response to vos Savant[41] that vos Savant still had not actually responded to their own main point.
She was wrong. So were her critics. The correct answer is, “What a terribly worded problem. Why don’t you rework it and ask me again when it contains the information I need?”
Vos Savant has done what all academics do when putting this problem to students (and I do when I am putting it to mine), she has turned a real problem that mathematicians cannot answer because they don’t know what the true probabilities are into one they can answer, by making plausible assumptions. Except that it is not clear in this case how plausible the assumptions are.
instead of bayes’s we have a minimax theorem which’ is a theorem providing conditions that guarantee that the max–min inequality is also an equality. The first theorem in this sense is von Neumann’s minimax theorem from 1928, which was considered the starting point of game theory. i can provide several links that hardly touch the subject since its not as popular as it should be, like many other areas that deal with chance, probability and regulation ignorance provails. the Monty Hall problem is not a probability puzzle* (It’s a challenge in mathematical modelling)here the deterministic component of a regression model does such a great job of explaining the dependent variable that it leaves only the intrinsically inexplicable portion of your study area for the error. If you can identify non-randomness in the error term, your independent variables are not explaining everything that they can. she is guilty of Stochastic Error. Subjectivists are more flexible about what they consider a probability. in reality when it comes to the Monty Hall Problem’ there is nothing to understand because the scientific method and it’s context, is an insult to my intelligence. just because i’m an actual philosopher doesn’t mean its possible for me to be wrong about anything. i’m usually write about everything becuase i Know everything, in this case switching can have no effect that is positive. or negative, or have the ability to effect the predeterminied deterministic result that is an effect of a cause. all of this (reality) is ignored because she is a women. (women keep on doing things like that [ignoreing reality]. what you think is a quick trick to help you be better at gambling is really just creating
a wishywashy society of imbeciles who think its okay to switch sides even though there is no proof. because of the quantity of 3 doors, the nature of probability is variable. and dimensions are being ignored to prop her up. i am going to raise up my children to go against Vos Savant. and have them fight against her. (intellectually) the Monty Hall Problem is Fraud. just like IQ tests. also… euler’s line is a straight line through the orthocenter, center of the nine-point circle, the centroid, and the circumcenter. these all represent potintial plot holes in Vos’s lack of
deterministic and quantitative restrictions of which it is only due to how attractive she is that these restrictions are somehow ignored by her.
she is a genius yes at manipulating elderly men into agreeing
with her. despite the reprocusions it would of had and now has had had on history and the economy and endless war.
imagine with each door was a suicide attempt and only one method
would result in a failed not fatal result
though you might wake up in a mental hospital but survive and
change your mind. eatch other attempt would be fatal. it makes no sense to take your chances anymore or less than it does or does not. because it is only 3 doors it is proof that
what she says about probability is nonsense.
that method (of taking chances) got her famous but
its not akeen to actual reality or probability
which is unmoved by external stimuli unless it is.
this is a situation that is not attributed to other situations
due to the relevancy of ratios. and the base objective reality
of ratios that is unmoved by external stimuli.
if you don’t understand how her answer is impossible or only
possible inlight of the rest of the complete answer of which you are all blind too. as for being stupid i’m the only intelligent
p[erson i have ever met in my life unless its a famous person. @Stubbari i’m refering to the scientific method not just objective reality. which doesn’t have a base requirement beyond 100. especially in a situation like this. if you don’t understand varibility or the mechanisms of the universe itsself than by all means’ your basically saying that sine waves and the 2nd and 3rd dimensions don’t exist and that intuition is irrlevant to probability to an extent but its not like that. you are abasically
saying that Fourier transforms don’t exist which is inhospitible. there is objective difference between the base
reality of the number 3 and 300. the dynamic results in differnt results and is at best a contrived hypothetical situation.
The number 300 is a triangular number and the sum of a pair of twin primes (149 + 151), as well as the sum of ten consecutive primes (13 + 17 + 19 + 23 + 29 + 31 + 37 + 41 + 43 + 47). It is palindromic in 3 consecutive bases: 30010 = 6067 = 4548 = 3639, and also in base 13. Factorization is 22 × 3 × 52. 30064 + 1 is prime (three hundred) is the natural number following 299 and preceding 301.
alot of people are quick to call me stupid for merely disagreeing
with her. yet over a 1000 phds disagreed with her.
just as it was wrong for her to suffer abuse.
it is wrong as well for me in the sense that i came
here to share my ideas not to be judged.
. this women is crazy.
you can not false accuse or portray this situation
in a dim subjective light by altering significant asepcts
of the problem in the first place. for example you say the number 300, which has differnt base espstemology even in
coding will have a different objective effect becuase it is
not the number 3 unless its in certain situations and this is most
certaintly not one of those situations.
Greater than 300, means, the number has to start from 3, 4, 5 & the digits not to be repeated, if we say 300 regadless of the reality
of 3. than we must
first we write all such numbers then , select even out of them. For even the last digit has to be either 2 or 4
Starting from 3:
312,314,315,321,324,325,341,342,345,351,352,
354
Starting from 4:
412,413,415,421,423,425,431,432,435,451,452, 453
Starting from 5:
512,513,514,521,523,524…
ect. most of these numbers are no more so related
to the number 3 than there number 300 conserding all the
objective digits inbetween.
the reason why digits and numbers are important
is because its the same as if two footballers where
faced unto a field
and forced to flip a coin.
the fact that door 3 is not a car uplevels
the base chosise both equally and unequally simutanously
canceling it out as equally equally.
for example 3 beautiful women come into your life.
you first fall madly in love with the first door
you don’t really know these women until the door is open.
the 3rd door is open and you can she is dumb like a goat
or animal or as no luxury like a car.
nor utility.
nor is a prize of a women.
your intuition
the women you first fell in love with.
verses the second door.
yes you learn alot about women by the revelation of
the 3rd goatwhamin door. but it is meaninless.
to the inititative or common situation.
if you are adelesant.
or nihilist or don’t believe in true love than pick
the 2nd door.
either way the woman is a thot since that chap
didn’t understand basic logic or intution
both women and food are like doors.
if you touch a piece of food you must put it on
your plate and eat it otherwise it is not polite
it is subjective to sujest that the second choise is
slightly more so promosing than the first choise.
when the revelation of the 3rd choise that was a porkchop
tasted by another agent in the wrong who despised
the tasted of the goat ridden pork.
there are 3 pieces of porkchops
one was cooked properly.
all eaters despise rare food due to paracites.
the first piece was rare and reveled by your drunk
cousin eating it too quick.
there are two more pieces one is cooked and seasoned
perfectly but the other was cooked rare and unseased
except for with goat milk. there are only two out of 3 pieces left.
and the truth of the two is kept secret.
these chops were cooked in your mothers kitchen with the lights
off.
to keep it extra secrete.
your first choise.
you can smell almost taste the seasoning ans lack of goatyness
and it is a porkchop that is delisious like a bran new car
or prize were as the other is mere cat food.
or something a drunk person you hate would eat.
i’m not saying your first choise is less or more
but both less and more and more and more and less and less
and less and more and is π condenced to it’s lowest form.
this is posible given the base inesacpeable reality that it
is a situation with 3 doors not 300. the reality of probability
is varible based on the decay of the oscilation of the wave.
as someone who has studied music in school. i cannot say i agree with Mrs. Vos Savant as she as contributed mathematical illiteracy and numerical fanaticism. that has endangered the world causeing empires to take more risks both economically and diplomatically. her utter ignorance and subjectivism will have or has had unregistered effects on situations were game theary is abused or misused to result in endless war and profit and both her and other so called savants are a threat to the environment, species of fish and cultures. i’m sure she means well. for example einstien was an idiot but heralded as a celebrity. yet he disagreed with the atomic bomb.
and now we have Vos Savant fanboys who don’t understand
basic math. basic logic yes but what i speak of is not actually
basic logic. actual logic yet but not… basic.
if you want basic go to the women (for math) and logic.
nothing she says is even remotely based in reality.
the real trick for companies is to filter out the people who
are naieve enough to simp to her verses the true individuals who
can think for themselves or even at all. (no offense).
even if there were infinite players. it does not change the fact, that the first choise. was not revealed, which equates it to the second choise, 1st or 2nd door as first or last choise, or change choise is irrelvant to probability, there is simply not enough quantity to verify probability beyond the objective chance, that precedes the situation. the probability can only be constributed to the determinsitic reality that is never ending change of causes and effects that set up the doors and goats and cars in the first place. the car burns gasoline at a specific ratio, even if you cover your eyes with your hand, yes you will crash the car but it doesn’t change how much gas is being burnt in the gas tank,
we are talking about 2 doors as a result of reveleation, there is only one player, imagine if one person fliped a coin, or if 1000 fliped a coin, it would still be 50% and would still be 2 doors. 2/3rds is too steep ratio becuase triangle & π and only as a chance relevant to the equation i invented. in quantom physics a machine can not remember the past without also being able to remember the future, x = (1/2=2/3 + - 1/2=1/3). Note the 1/3 is included and the +- (my interpretation of it) to balance out this aspect of reality. you are basically saying that gravity doesn’t exist. this is another example of how IQ tests are meaningless. this situation is immune to the futiles
of exitential probability. a house-cat isn’t a tiger.
actually she is wrong because there are 3 doors. not 100. the 2nd door = x and x = (1/2=2/3 + - 1/2=1/3). the incedence and the situation she refers to have a subjective corrorlation. this is another reason why democracy doesn’t work. because the people are manipulated into not understanding basic math.
3 is the number of angles of triangle. and basis of π condenced to it’s minimal form.
the triangle is an octove of π and it’s the membrain
effect of the numbers, the gravity of them that
protects them from being corrorlated with her
discountected hypothesis. the quantitative relevance of the limited and specific amount
of doors sheilds us from her superstition. i feel sorry
for those that said sorry to her. @Errortonin So on average 150, which is half of the 300 or 1/2.
So how many players out of 300, on average, choose the door with the car when there are 3 doors to choose from and only 1 has the car? So let’s say there are 300 people playing the game. Each choose a random door, then host reveals a goat from the other 2 doors and offers a switch BUT everyone decides to STAY with their initial pick.
How many of those 300 people on average are going to win? on average. 150. its not 2/3rd because of coin flips. for example if i purchase one car. than the price of everyother car that is in a foreign country, is irrelevant. and then also if there is only two choises with no evidence. than 0% or 0/3 would win if they picked door 2, so long as its not door 2 if they picked door one it would be 100% if it was door 1, its subjective to suggest that the 3rd door being scractched off effects the totality of the randombility, in almost any other given situation yes, but here there is no evidence that the peripheries of a coin can effect that randomness of a coin flip. even if the coin is next to a (revealed) coin. this is why polls should be ignored.
because of the reality of ratios. the first pick is irrlevant, so long as 3 is not the first pick. there is no evidence that is corrorlated with the other two options.
what you say is hypothetical. and has nothing to do with anything, i feel sorry for you because of your spelling calibor.
she is wrong. her inferance doesn’t carry weight. “Actually she is absolutely correct. You would also know this if you had paid attention in school.”
Assume you stick with your first pick.
If your first pick is Goat A, you get Goat A.
If your first pick is Goat B, you get Goat B.
If your first pick is the car, you get the car
You only win 1 out of 3 games if you stick with your first pick.
Basic math/logic kids understand, idiot among idiots cannot.
Makes sense
@Errortonin
“because of the reality of ratios. the first pick is irrlevant”
Let’s say the game start with 1 door (1 car).
After you make a pick, the host add a goat door and then give you a chance to switch.
What is your winning chance if you stick with your first pick?
It’s 100%, right?
Now, if the first pick is “irrlevant”, does that means your winning chance is 1 out of 2 doors = 50%?
“so long as 3 is not the first pick.”
lmao.
What if the player pick D3?
Since D3 is a goa and the host has to show another goat, then the last door is the car.
@Klaus 74 look in the mirror. how many people do you see?
GnL Out
1 day ago
Spelling calibor?
Is calibor another word for ‘irony’?
@Klaus 74 you can’t test this problem.
@Errortonin Just tell me:
if there are 300 players, how many on average are going to choose the door with the car?
@Errortonin “you can’t test this problem.”
So by looking at the card you first picked you are too stupid to know if staying or switching will win. That’s pretty sad.
@Klaus 74 whats sad is that your socalled problem is not Peer reviewed (or well respected). even if you do it in your mom’s basement.
@Errortonin “That kind of explains why you would have so much trouble understanding the Monty Hall Problem. Others can try it out for themselves with three cards, two marked ‘goat’, one marked ‘car’ by simply writing down what was first picked. Not everyone is smart enough to know by looking at it so they have to turn over a ‘goat’ card from the other pile first before they write it down. If the card you picked is a ‘goat’ then you can write down that switching wins. If the card you picked is the ‘car’ then you can write down that staying wins. I told you to write it down because you are having so much trouble understanding the problem. I don’t have to write anything down because I am smart enough to know if my pick will win by staying or win by switching just from looking at it. Just tell me:
if there are 300 players, how many on average are going to choose the door with the car? if you keep track of your first pick, you’ll know how often you win by staying and you’ll also know how often you win by switching because it’s the inverse of the “stay” result. Why do you think you cant do that (and why would you even need to “test” if if logically, nobody disputes that you pick the winning card one in three times out of three cards.) Take three cards, two marked ‘goat’, one marked ‘car’. Place them face down and turn one of them over. If by looking at it you are smart enough to know if staying will win or that switching will then you should also be smart enough to know that a reveal of a ‘goat’ wouldn’t have made a difference.”-
that is not true, you do not have the ability to do that.
i agree that i can write but you can’t.
the inverse of the “stay” result, is undermined. forexample, what if the player chooses a different card? psychology is arbitrary to innate varibility. yet there is contradiction.
her premise is that the reveleation can effect base object unision, even though it solidifies it. switching, is arbitrary, when we are dealing with the number 3. thats why we should not be impresionable. just becasue we no we are not wrong, doesn’t mean we made a mistake, its obvious that the reveal of the goat makes a difference, and is apart of the reason why what she says is true for almost any situation that isn’t this one.
because of the context of the problem, her ideas mean nothing, and she is wrong.-
“@Errortonin let me say it this way - you have a stay card and a switch card. You’re left with a choice between two at the time of the switch, so it’s one or the other and the prize is actually behind one of the two.
If your ‘stay’ door is 1/3, then the only other door is 2/3.
This is how you can test this game with three cards. Stay every time and keep track of how often you win. Every other time, you’d win by switching…lol…obviously the Monty Hall Problem is way too difficult for you to understand.”
err, I appreciate the thinking outside of the box, but this problem is settled. And frankly, you are all over the place
There is one important rule to this problem - whether or not the host must open a goat door. That’s it. Nothing else matters.
What I’ve been talking about with my last two posts about this problem being demonstrable with three cards is factually 100 percent correct.
You’re first card is a winner one third of the time. It’s not a debatable point.
And if you don’t take my word for it, pull up a simulator. Or watch the Mythbusters 5 minute video where they test it. better yet, point me to a site that explains what you are trying to say. Between the language and spelling barriers and the metaphysical angles, it’s not easy to understand what you are trying to convey.”
-Ms. vos Savant acknowledged that the ambiguity did exist in her original statement-“I wouldn’t have minded if they had raised that objection,” she said Friday, “because it would mean they really understood the problem.”which is a logically self-contradictory statement or a statement that runs contrary to one’s expectation. It is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true premises, leads to a seemingly self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion. A paradox usually involves contradictory-yet-interrelated elements that exist simultaneously and persist over time. They result in “persistent contradiction between interdependent elements” leading to a lasting “unity of opposites”.a paradox relating to conditional probability with respect to an event of probability zero (also known as a null set) The partial conditional probability. From the law of total probability, its expected value is equal to the unconditional probability of it’s (predetermined and undermined) self. she ignores a discrete random variable and its possible outcomes denoted as the cavemen see only the nonzero probability without light of it’s premise or interactions. she is a solo, siloed investigator limited to small sample sizes,
No preregistration of hypotheses being tested,
Post-hoc cherry picking of hypotheses with best values,
Only requiring P < .05,
No replication,
No data sharing.
it is either because C will be pardoned (1/3 chance), or A will be pardoned (1/3 chance) and the coin to decide whether to name B or C the warden flipped came up B (1/2 chance; for an overall 1/2 × 1/3 = 1/6 chance a general result in extreme value theory regarding asymptotic distribution of extreme order statistics.as above) to refer to their actual observed values is erroneous. subjects overwhelmingly respond
as if the targets represented categories, overriding (but not consciously) the actual
question, as we override the literal question the default (if the defaulting conjecture is correct) will be such that the
illusory “equal chances” intuition is prompted. And we can pick out two such pairs,
which immediately suggests why this illusory intuition is notoriously hard to correct, but it is in the realm of social policy that the most
serious consequences are likely to arise, but there nothing so simple as to allow a flat, no
qualifications, verdict of “error” can be expected.
minimax is a theorem providing conditions that guarantee that the max–min inequality is also an equality. something ms. Savant
and her conrines don’t realize, is the darkmatter that disasembles her conclusions which are not based on reality nor the whole story. it is utterly unprovable. and a threat to society.

\A sophistical rhetorician [Error], inebriated with the exuberance of his own verbosity, and gifted with an egotistical imagination that can at all times command an interminable and inconsistent series of arguments to malign an opponent and to glorify himself. communism isn’t an alternative economic system its an alternate form of reality. it doesn’t have a good enough premise to be comparied to something like economics, sysystems yes but not economics communism is economic fraud not just because of it’s subjective premise but because of it’s outlook, it’s false perspective. its obviously classist so you can’t really get more economic fraud than that, and when it comes to proving that communism is fraud it is similar to the argument with atheists where people falsely accuse atheists of not being able to prove that gwad exists 100% when in reality you don’t have to prove a negative the first result of faith as a conviction is suicide and that is for either communists or christians. there is no economic ideal, the idea of the afterlife is merely a doorway for suicide. and the idea of economic savant’s forcing their brutality onto other individuals (without having anything to back it up) is one of the reasons no one is actually communist. i’m a jazz musician and jazz music similar to uspanishads is about the self or self expression. if you look at what actual jazz musicians did and the people they were sourrounded by and the instruments they used. it was Nothing like communists who are anti art. anti jazz. in reality they are paracites not just to society but in real life if i wasted time with them they or it would be dead weight becuase they are self absorbed or detachted from their self to the point that they can’t function as individuals they can’t function as jazz musicians despite lack of inability to play jazz. its only because they can’t Think for themselves that they are not actual jazz musicians, and then they inflitrait our culture and community and act like making the world a better place is more important than love or jazz, when in reality i would rather commit suicide than spend time around people who are not helping me create hit records. the community is for people who are pretentious. for the most part. if i were in prison i would choose solitary confinment. and thats what capitalism is. or why most people who are intelligent go off the grid. in every imaginable way. just something small like culture, jazz, or photography is enough to deligitimize it and make it look like much more so of a joke than something like capitalism or anarchism. i can see how communism and un registered capitalism can be as bad as fascism and monarchy, but communists don’t see this becuase they are not legitimate as philosophers, or histortians, similar to chiristians or corrupt politicians they refer to deterministic reality without actually understanding it or beingh awhere. just like pollution covers up an individual’s third eye communism does the same to a person’s political scope. and concept of reality. its a very thin way to live or look at the world. just like how freaudian brutality is outdated and needs to be phased out. the anti semitism of reverse classism generated from pathetic neoliberalism who are wannabe communists who basically have nothing intelligent to say the moment someone says the word priveledge they are basically saying that they are a paracite. a hypocrite. illiterate and antisemetic. and a failure at life. all classism is a form of antisemitism and all communism that is not tolerate of religion is antisemetic and islamiphobic. and is much more so like a disease than an economic system. the moment any communists mentions the word economy it is the same as a civil war dentist tring to do steem cell research even though he has never herd of it. competition is good for art. and food. and subculture. and evolution. objective reality and utilitarianism are good things but can be exploited by corrupt corporations and the result is fraud and poison. fraud and poison is a base requirement for industrialization. there has so far not really been an objective justification for industrialization and communism anymore or less than nationalism, monarchy, and fascism. they are all arbitrary to the ideal life (basic freedom of choise) and are not humanistic enought to be considered applicable to any form of logic that is relevant to wisdom. 
what american women don’t realize is that cat calling is 10 times less bad than tinder and is obviously an evolutionary adaptavtion the only men so weak that they don’t cat call (merely speak to a women in public) are beta males. so this feeds into the stigma generated by females who have bad taste in men and then turn it into a political ideology that ignores science and history. if they want to solve the worl’d economic problems than they need to make it easier to counter fit money. women who sport the idea of good men versus bad men are idiots there is no such thing as a good man, especially if they have sex with a sexist woman. in reality what women think a good man is is meaninless because having money has nothing to do with wheather or not you are good or not. for the same reason homeless are invisible men can be considerd bad. but doesn’t mean it has anything to do with reality or her personality disorder. throughout history, catcalling has been were babies come from. the idea that cat calling is bad’ is a neoliberal depopulation technique. that will when up killing more than it saves.(by demonizing it) if it weren’t for catcalling than i wouldn’t exist which is proof that liberals are stupid. its only if a women has a serious mental health issue that she would have a problem with a slight compliment (catcalling) the reason why women want to be catcalled because it is a sign the man is literally willing to just have sex with her publically in the middle of the street. anything else than that is Not love at firstsight and it encourages men to start lureing’ women and almost anyway to get laid that isn’t cat calling is a form of manipulation. if the guy can’t cat call properly then that that is a red flag same as how if the man is not a cat person. then no women could trust him. in missouri weed is legal but not abortion.s which is good because most missouri men smoke too much weed to be able to get an abortion in the firstplace.  if a woman wants to be good all she has to do is be quiet if a man wants to be good. he has to go back in time and kill himself, but also have a car. the state will always have similar flaws to capitalism it’sse;f due to human impulse. there is no such thing as a state with checks or balances. nor is the ideal state precieveable or acheviable the reason socialism is fraud is because the ideal capitalism and ideal industrialization and the ideal nation is not accetable. preciveable or acheivable. america is a good place to grow up as a kid, but not a good place to reside if you are an adult or literate. my method of picking up women is to pay them for sex. but its scary/